Another Blackplanet poll - 3.22.2007.1

I have seen a poll recently, found at Blackplanet.com, that is quite interesting. The question the poll asks is “What medium has the most negative images of Blacks?”

It’s a good question. The choices are the TV, Newspapers. Internet, Music, Movies and Film. This is an ongoing survey with only 4742 respondents at the moment (out of a potential of several million that are part of Blackplanet), but it is still quite interesting. Which of these would you pick as the single worst source of negative imagery? [I’m not sure what the difference is between Film and Movies as I see them as being the same thing, but excluding that issue the question stands.]

You might be surprised by the answer. Then again maybe not. The Internet and Film both hit the bottom of the list at 3%, followed in order by Newspapers at 8%, Movies at 9%, TV 25% and the big leader is Music at 53%. I have no doubt that Music leads this group due to music videos, especially those of rappers that feature the ladies barely clothed and gyrating. Of course those with the ridiculous (my opinion) stuff on their teeth, or those incapable of speaking their native language are no less unattractive.

Given the recent news of the decline of sales for rap music, the media assault that tried to link the abuse of children and the teens that provided drugs to them to rap, and the actions of various individuals (such as the cops making their own impromptu video) based on the commoditization of Black culture – beyond the various antics of numerous rappers themselves – this points to an interesting trend. As the version of rap that floods the airwaves and music videos becomes less appealing, and the focus of many African Americans turns away from the ‘ghettofabulous’, I wonder what will happen next. Where will the executives of the music industry turn next to inflate sales of this genre. Will they retreat from the former ‘gansta’ rap splinter and expand the genre to include more positive formats.

Ten years ago I doubt that these results would be so strongly against music. But as the teens and 20-somethings of the 1990’s mature it seems that they see less value and more of the downside of what was touted as merely an expression of what was the real life on the streets. Interestingly some of these supposed street prophets never grew up in the environment they espoused about (like Ice Cube and Dr Dre if my memory serves me, among others), and the number of one hit flash-in-the-pans grew massively. While the music industry was flooded with this one style (which smacks of censorship to me) and Black culture was commoditized, the second generation of rap aged and music videos innovated on misogyny and female gyration. I’m not surprised by the stagnation of the genre, I am by the fact that it is finally sinking in even as record companies seek new ways to market the same trash in new packages.

So if this poll gains a couple of million respondents will the results continue to maintain these values? Does this mean that we may again see more positive or political rap artists? Might the egos and actions of rap/hip-hop entertainers fall from the lofty delusional self-important heights they exist at now? Like “...Because Kayne West didn’t win best video he decided to jump onstage and berate the audience, some of which may be his fans, because he felt unappreciated. The fact he did win an award wasn’t good enough. With an ego seemingly that large one would have to wonder how it all fit on that stage.”

Perhaps I am too harsh, or expect too much. Perhaps I feel the need to critique these instant ultra-entertainers, like when I commented on Eminem “…Secondly, Eminem is hardly a gold standard to follow. Eminem failed 9th grade three times and dropped out of high school. He has made millions attacking his mother and then ex-wife on various recordings. He received 2 years probation on a concealed weapons charge [shall we say slap on the wrist], was sued for defamation, and is often noted for his apparent homophobia (performing on stage with a gay man is a marketing gimmick not a statement about personal thoughts) and misogyny as expressed by his music. The last 2 items, and possibly the legal charges, are of course positives when rappers are concerned. But to be considered a role model seems hardly credible…”

If I am too extreme in my thoughts, good. There needs to be a balance and difference in opinion. And it seems that my side of the equation is growing.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Breaking the law entertainer-style

I am amazed at times by the actions of entertainers these days, and even moreso in cases by the reaction of law authorities in these cases. By example I mean Mr. Daniel Baldwin, who was not charged with a felony though he was arrested with drug possession and drug paraphernalia. Now perhaps Mr. Baldwin did not have enough cocaine to justify the felony charge, and perhaps he is not large enough of a star to merit the same kinds of leeway given to other big name entertainers, but somehow I doubt that. Were I, a Puerto Rican Black African American male with a clean record and prior service in the military, in the same circumstances I feel confident that the charge would be a felony. But as I said, perhaps I’m wrong.

Of course I’m not an entertainer. But were I, or a friend of mine who has gotten a drunk driving charge as a better example, it would be nice to be able to get the minor slap on the wrist that Ms. Michelle Rodriguez has received. While Ms. Rodrigues did serve 4 days in jail, her choice instead of 240 hours of community service, and a fine of $500 it does not compare to the suspended licence, $1000 fine, ~30 hours mandated drunk driver counseling that my friend received. My friend is a Black African American male. Perhaps the fact that this was in New York State that made the difference. Of course he wasn’t on a 3 year probation from a prior drunk driving charge either.

And there is my favorite entertainer a rapper. This time it happens to be Snoop Dogg, otherwise known as Calvin Broadus, and occurred internationally. What did snoop do you wonder? He and his associates assaulted police offices, resulting in 6 officers receiving minor wounds and cuts, and verbally abused employees of a duty-free shop and British Airways. Why would they do this? Because 3 of the associates did not have first-class tickets and were rightly denied access to the first-class lounge. Who do these guys think they are? If its such a big deal, why didn’t they just upgrade their tickets to first-class. And what gives them the right to abuse people for doing their jobs. And while throwing what I perceive as a tantrum the decide to pick a fight with the police. Now honestly does anyone who may read this think that a fight with officers over being denied entry where they shouldn’t be is worth it? Do you think that you would get out of the situation on a bail withing less than 24 hours? And for those of us that are Black African American, Hispanic or other minorities do you think that the cops wouldn’t have retaliated. I’m sure it would be explained as injuries due to resisting arrest or accidentally falling down some stairs, but I don’t doubt for a second that there would be repercussions. Hello Mr. Rodney King and Mr. Amadu Diallo.

I can see why some entertainers think they are better than average when these kinds of incidents, or others I have mentioned and the multiple others that I haven’t, occur and the reactions they receive. And some take it to an extreme I just don’t understand, like kanye west and his personal view of Jesus Christ (his picture portrayal on the cover of Rolling Stones I believe).

Of course some entertainers just think they deserve recognition because they are a big fish in their small pool. Like 50 cent [I still find that name annoying, 3rd grade english reminds us that it should be 1 cent or 3 cents but when have rappers needed english] who believes he is put upon due to Ms. Oprah Winfrey not inviting more rappers on her program. How the fact that Ms. Winfrey has not asked 50 cent to be on her show affects him or his career is sheer hubris to me. And how dare he, in effect, demand that Ms. Winfrey change how she does her work. If 50 cent does not realize it Ms. Winfrey makes over $50 million a year, is a media mogul and well respected. She does not need him, and picking on her viewers is just sour grapes to me.

The same can be said of Ludacris [another name I just won’t go into] who like many rappers, including the above mentioned 50 cent, believe they are actors on par with the likes of Mr. Denzel Washington or Ms. Halle Berry. In this case the statement was that Ms. Winfrey didn’t give enough time to ludacris, keeping it for herself (how dare she), and focusing to much on his main career of rapping. Perhaps when ludacris makes 10 million a picture and can be nominatied for an Emmy or an Oscar, Ms. Winfrey will focus on his acting, I think.

But I think all entertainers need to get off their high horses. Whether they get paid to play a game, sing a song, or play pretend they are being paid for work that is far less strenuous than working in a steel mill or a waitress in a diner. Their pay is also significantly greater. Considering that and the fact that far more often than not they receive slaps on the wrist when they deserve far harsher penalties for breaking laws, entertainers should stop acting like children. Or is it our fault for treating them like spoiled brats with a silver spoon?

This is what I think, what do you think?