Your pets cause global warming so eat them

Maybe it's me but I wonder what PETA is going to say about a recent article by AFP on how pets are the next global warming (or are they using the new 'climate change' slogan) problem that needs to be solved?

Don't believe me?

"The Vales, specialists in sustainable living at Victoria University of Wellington, analysed popular brands of pet food and calculated that a medium-sized dog eats around 164 kilos (360 pounds) of meat and 95 kilos of cereal a year.

Combine the land required to generate its food and a "medium" sized dog has an annual footprint of 0.84 hectares (2.07 acres) -- around twice the 0.41 hectares required by a 4x4 driving 10,000 kilometres (6,200 miles) a year, including energy to build the car."

So this theory, backed up by John Barrett at the Stockholm Environment Institute, indicates that dogs, and cats, are more dangerous to the environment than cars. Of course hamsters and even goldfish were not left out of the analysis. In each case it was found that a pet is an additional burden to the planet.

What's the solution proposed? PETA and animal lovers will really get a kick out of this.

"But the best way of compensating for that paw or clawprint is to make sure your animal is dual purpose, the Vales urge. Get a hen, which offsets its impact by laying edible eggs, or a rabbit, prepared to make the ultimate environmental sacrifice by ending up on the dinner table.

"Rabbits are good, provided you eat them," said Robert Vale."

Taking this "solution" to its logical end, it means that ANY pet is only worth having if you eventually eat them. And I'm not reaching on that conclusion. Mr. Vale wrote a book on his conclusion titled Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living. Do you get his point?

I admit that I have never believed in global warming. Nor global cooling a couple of decades before that. Nor the latest trend/fad of climate change (a true act of verbal idiocy - the climate is constantly changing and has been since before man existed).

But I would never condone the views that Vale and potentially other eco-fanatics will inevitably present. Pets, of all kinds, are not meals. They are members of families and valuable companions.

Perhaps it is just me, but I feel that a pet is far more important than some questionable science that is politically based and factually proven to have been manipulated and promoted for self-interests.

Where are the animal lovers? Where is PETA, a group that has no problem attacking virtually every group they consider even marginally against animal rights? I mean they went after the Pet Shop Boys just because of the band's name, and I have yet to see anything about this - which I feel is far more serious in its implications.

I may not agree with all the tactics and thoughts of PETA, but I respect the fact they have strong convictions. I love dogs, and I really fear the thinking Vale and others have for this political fantasy dressed as science. PETA and pet lovers need to say something. Because in a world of "Change you can believe in" I guarantee that at some point Al Gore will get in his private jet and tell some political group across the world that pet levels need to be reduced worldwide and it will help feed the hungry too.

Don't believe me, but already the Government has said that CO2, our exhaled breaths, are a danger to the planet. Which means the Government will want to regulate that CO2, and if a pet is more "deadly" than a SUV or car... well you can imagine what happens next.

What dog would you pick?

Ok, here is a question. I am planning on getting a dog. But I'm not sure which type of dog would be best for me. So since I know many of my readers have pets, and you are an intelligent group of people, who better to ask for an opinion from.

A couple of facts first. I own a 2005 sq ft 2 story home. I have a small but fenced in yard. And I live within minutes of a vet. I'm single with no kids. I work from home a great deal, but occasionally do take business trips. And yes I can afford a dog. And I will get the dog once my carpets are all removed, so wood floors.

In the past I have owned Chows. I like Bulldogs, great character, but I don't think they can handle the stairs in the house. I hate pitbulls, dislike Rotweilers, and generally frown on small dogs. In fact I'm thinking of a mid-sized dog, of moderate maintenence. The climate in my area (Binghamton NY) is generally rainy, very cold in the winter, and moderate to hot spring and summer.

Given these facts what might you suggest, and why? I really would like to know. And once I pick my dog, I will have photos up for you all to see.

Pet poisoning leads to $24 million lawsuit

There is nothing like a pet. They are our friends, protectors, and often entertainment as well. They are in essence and fact family. And a year ago hundreds of these beloved members of our family were murdered in our own homes. That murder was via poisons in the food we served to our pets.

The poison was placed, accidentally, in the food we served our pets in China. There were over 200 pet food labels that were involved in the scandal that started in March 2007. And as of today a judge has awarded $24 million to the lawsuit for those that were harmed.

I think it was hardly enough.

There have been 10,000 pet owners that filed for the lawsuit so far. And if you had a pet that was affected you can file up until November 24th. It is expected that for every verified claim there will be an award of $1,500 depending on the number of claims. And if there are funds left over then the proceeds will be given to animal welfare charities.

But the law does not view our pets as family members. It will not allow penalties for the pain and suffering that was inflicted to the families that lost a loved one. That is a failure of the legal system.

The point of such lawsuits is to inflict an equivalent pain to the offender, and to prevent future occurances of the offense. While this is a large amount it is hardly the equivalent, nor does it reach the levels that need to force animal food companies from getting foods from China.

China by the way is unaffected by this lawsuit. That is another shame. While I understand China is so inept that they are equally poisoning their own children, I still see no change in their policies, especially in regard with foreign nations. A huge penalty by law could help to force better standards in that nation.

One thing is sure, our pets deserve better. Hopefully the companies that sold and had the foods made for them will be more critical and proactive in the future. Because there is no reason such wanton murder should ever have happened in the first place.